New Study: Red Flags in Florida’s Transportation Stimulus Wish List
State DOTs Shortchange Crumbling
Infrastructure, Public Transportation, and Long-Term
Economic Vitality
TALLAHASSEE – A new study of the states’ Departments of
Transportation (DOTs) wish lists, recently submitted to Congress for funding
under a new economic recovery package, suggests that current project list would
undermine efforts to repair and modernize our deteriorating infrastructure and
reduce U.S. dependence on oil.
The study also shows that President-elect Obama’s stated
intention to invest in a modernized infrastructure that will create jobs and
build a clean, smarter economy for the 21st century could be
undermined if the Florida DOT spends transportation stimulus funds the way they
and other states have suggested in their wish lists to Congress.
“The lists submitted by these states, including the list
submitted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) dramatically favor
new highway projects over road & bridge repair and transit projects.” said
Brad Ashwell, Florida PIRG’s Lead Advocate. “It is wrongheaded, in an era when
public transportation is booming and bridges need repair, for state’s to
prioritize building new highways over repairing existing infrastructure and
expanding public transportation systems.”
“We can both create jobs and rebuild our economy in the
short term in a way that helps to solve our long-term energy challenges,” said
Ashwell. “But we can’t afford to waste precious resources on new highways at
the expense of ready-to-go projects to repair and maintain existing roads and
bridges. We also need leaders to seize this opportunity to expand existing public
transportation systems.”
Under the Florida Department of Transportation’s wish list
requests:
---- Florida would spend
only 1 percent of stimulus funds on public transit/intercity rail
projects.
---- The
Florida DOT has allocated $6.890 million dollars to highway projects, 99
percent of that going to new or expanded capacity over the maintenance
needs of the states infrastructure.
---- Fixing
existing bridges and roads and system preservations is not prioritized at
all. Approximately 10 percent of the total amount requested is allocated
to a mere 14 bridge and highway rehabilitation and resurfacing projects.
According to the State Highway Administration, Florida has 129 structurally deficient highway
bridges among those that receive federal-aid. There are 302 structurally
deficient bridges total in Florida.
---- Out of 16 states only 5 states placed a greater
emphasis than Florida
on highway projects over public transit/intercity rail projects.
The 16-state study examines available state Department of
Transportation wish lists sent to Congress as part of the development of the
next economic recovery package. The sixteen state transportation lists for
“ready-to-go” projects indicate that:
---- Despite increasing transit ridership nationwide,
on average, the states would spend only sixteen percent of funds on public
transit or intercity rail projects. Seven of the sixteen states, including Florida, would allocate
1 percent or less to transit or intercity rail, including four that would
allocate nothing at all.
---- In spite of hundreds of billions of dollars in
backlogged maintenance and repair for crumbling infrastructure, more than half
of transportation funds would flow to highway projects to build new or wider
highways. Half of states would spend less than a third of road funds to protect
and restore existing bridges and roads.
---- The vast majority of states have not disclosed
their transportation wish lists for public scrutiny. Only a few states have
even made their lists available for this report, and even fewer have released
the list to the public. Florida’s
list can be found on the Florida Department of Transportation’s website but not
easily.
The report documents why it is critically important how stimulus
infrastructure money is spent. Misguided transportation polices of the past
have contributed to many of America’s
most pressing problems. Each year the average American living in an urban area
spends 38 hours – nearly a full work week – stuck in traffic delays.
Transportation has become the second biggest expense for the average household
– even more than health care and just behind housing costs. Our transportation system is the chief source
of the nation's oil dependency. And vehicles are the biggest end-user source of
global warming pollution, contributing to a third of the nation's greenhouse
gas emissions.
“Fixing aging bridges and speeding up road maintenance is a
faster way to create jobs and stimulate the economy than building more highway
capacity,” stated Ashwell. “It makes no
sense to build new roads that increase our addiction to oil when you can create
jobs, meet growing demand for public transportation and reduce oil consumption
by funding transit operations and getting far-sighted transit projects off the
drawing board and into action.”
The Florida PIRG report called on states to disclose the
wish lists they’ve submitted to Congress and for stimulus funds to support
operations for transit agencies struggling to accommodate booming ridership.
The report calls on Congress, the Obama Administration, and
state leaders to apply the following principles to the writing and
implementation of the next federal economic recovery legislation:
(1) Highways should receive no
more funds than the combined total for public transit, intercity rail, and
bicycle and pedestrian projects; (2) Any road funds should go first
to maintenance and repair of structurally deficient bridges and roads, not new
highways or lanes; (3) Public transportation funds
should include support for operations so agencies can accommodate rising
demand; (4) Surface Transportation Program
highway funds should be distributed as under current law so that a portion of
resources flow directly to metropolitan areas that know best about which local
projects are needed; (5) All states, cities, and
agencies should publicly disclose the stimulus lists they have submitted; (6) Direct recipients of stimulus
funds should report on how money was spent and any transportation spending that
it displaced.
“President-elect
Obama has likened his economic recovery plan to President Eisenhower’s vision
in the 1950s to create an Interstate Highway System,” said Ashwell. “These
state project lists would be more like spending billions for a network of
horse-drawn carriage paths. They wouldn’t solve America’s transportation problems,
and might even make them worse.”